Q: Why should you be careful if you meet someone whose passport is from the British West Indies?
A: Because the British West Indies does not issue passports. Indeed, the British West Indies is not a country: it's a geographic term for a group of islands in the Atlantic including Anguilla, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Montserrat, and the Turks and Caicos Islands.
So, why are there people with British West Indies passports? Because there's a market for camouflage passports - fake passports for nonexistent countries. The people who sell these claim they can used for legal purposes like fooling terrorists and hijackers who'll kill you if you're from the United States. That seems eminently practical - as long as these guys aren't too sharp on geography - but it's just possible these documents could be used for shadier purposes, too.
There are a lot of websites that sell camouflage passports. To quote one of these:
There are also fake British West Indies drivers' licenses, also handy whenever terrorists and hijackers ask to check your ID:
What are Camouflage Passports?
Camouflage Passports (CPs) are passports of countries no longer in existence, e.g. former British or Dutch colonies such as Rhodesia, Zanzibar, Dutch Guiana, Netherlands East Indies. These states have usually changed their names, typically after gaining independence. Thus, British Honduras is now Belize, while Zanzibar fused with then time Tanganyika to become today's Tanzania. Upper Volta became Burkina Faso, and of course, some of the most recent examples include the USSR and Czechoslovakia.
When American travelers became prime targets of hijacking and international terrorism on an ever increasing scale, CPs were invented to afford them some additional security. The idea was to present a potential hijacker with a valid looking, non-American document to hide one's identity. Thus, it was supposed, terrorists might pick someone else to harp upon, to take hostage or even to kill. CPs were never intended to be used as actual traveling documents at border controls, etc.
Do I really need one?Probably, if you want to protect your privacy! At least, that's the common sentiment. Actually, this prejudice is not a bad thing at all as these passports obviously won't be of much use any longer, once every man and his dog knows about them or even has one himself. So, the fewer people that actually employ them, the better for all concerned. After all, discretion has always been a critical mainstay of personal security and safety. But let's check it out in more detail:
If you refrain from traveling; if you are in possession of a valid second citizenship for emergency purposes already and have at least some of your assets stowed away in safety (preferably not in the country where you are living most of the time, nor at the place where you actually work); if you are in no need at all of truly anonymous banking - yes, in that case (and in that case alone!) - it might seem a sheer waste of time and money to obtain a CP, unless you are into collecting that sort of curios. However, that will hardly apply to most of us! Plus: you can never actually know before some nasty streak of events whether you are really in safety or not, can you?
This was found at the Militia Watchdog Image Gallery of the Anti-Defamation League. In an article about police encounters with right-wing extremists in the US, they tell the following story:
Far more common than events such as shootings or assaults are those in which extremists are merely obstreperous, arguing with and otherwise defying the officer who pulls them over. The example of Mark Kuncik of Ansonia, Connecticut, is representative of hundreds if not thousands of similar traffic stops across the nation. Pulled over in December 1997 by local police because he had a phony license plate which said "British West Indies," he turned out also to have a suspended driver's license and no car insurance. But Kuncik claimed to be immune from all motor vehicle laws and free from any requirement to carry insurance or registration. He said that any judge that convicted him would be violating his constitutional rights and would be tried for treason. He was arrested.Sources:
For more fun try these: