The state of our spinning electron is therefore specified by giving a ratio
of two complex numbers (since ), not both zero.
Mathematically, this is just the complex projective line. The
correspondence between points on the complex projective line and points on
the Riemann sphere is well-known; I will make use of it in a moment.
^{3}

Physically, we want to picture the electron as a little ball, spinning about some axis. It has angular momentum. In more detail, the angular momentum vector is a vector pointing along the axis of rotation, with length proportional to the speed of rotation. This defines the vector up to sign. The sign ambiguity is resolved, conventionally, by the right hand rule of thumb: if you curl the fingers of your right hand in the direction of rotation, the thumb points in the direction of the angular momentum vector.

Classically, the electron could be spinning at any speed, so its angular momentum could have any magnitude. In quantum mechanics, the angular momentum is quantized: its magnitude (measured along the axis of rotation) must be for any spin particle. (Note: , where of course is Planck's constant.)

The quantization of angular momentum, although inexplicable classically, is easy enough to picture: we just stipulate that our spinning ball must be spinning at a particular rate. So we should be able to specify the spin state of the electron just by giving a direction in 3-space, or equivalently, by picking a point on the sphere . But I just noted that the set of states is ``isomorphic'' to the Riemann sphere. So everything fits.

© 2001 Michael Weiss