William Clifford invented his algebras in 1876 as an attempt to
generalize the quaternions to higher dimensions, and he published a
paper about them two years later . Given a real inner
product space , the Clifford algebra is the
associative algebra freely generated by modulo the relations
To see this relation, first suppose is a normed division algebra.
Left multiplication by any element gives an operator
Using this inner product, we say an element is imaginary if it is orthogonal to the element , and we let be the space of imaginary elements of . We can also think of as the tangent space of the unit sphere in at the point . This has a nice consequence: since maps the unit sphere in to the Lie group of orthogonal transformations of , it must send to the Lie algebra of skew-adjoint transformations of . In short, is skew-adjoint whenever is imaginary.
The relation to Clifford algebras shows up when we compute the square of
. We can do this most easily when has norm
. Then is both orthogonal and skew-adjoint. For any
orthogonal transformation, we can find some orthonormal basis in which
its matrix is block diagonal, built from blocks that look
We have already described the Clifford algebras up to . Further calculations [50,73] give the following table, where we use to stand for matrices with entries in the algebra :
Table 2 — Clifford Algebras
Starting at dimension 8, something marvelous happens: the table continues
in the following fashion:
Since Clifford algebras are built from matrix algebras over and , it is easy to determine their representations. Every representation is a direct sum of irreducible ones, or irreps. The only irrep of is its obvious one via matrix multiplication on . Similarly, the only irrep of is the obvious representation on , and the only irrep of is the obvious one on .
Glancing at the above table, we see that unless equals or modulo , is a real, complex or quaternionic matrix algebra, so it has a unique irrep. For reasons to be explained later, this irrep is known as the space of pinors and denoted . When is or modulo , the algebra is a direct sum of two real or quaternionic matrix algebras, so it has two irreps, which we call the positive pinors and negative pinors . We summarize these results in the following table:
Table 3 — Pinor Representations
Examining this table, we see that in the range of dimensions listed there is an -dimensional representation of only for and . What about higher dimensions? By Bott periodicity, the irreducible representations of are obtained by tensoring those of by . This multiplies the dimension by 16, so one can easily check that for , the irreducible representations of always have dimension greater than .
It follows that normed division algebras are only possible in dimensions and . Having constructed and , we also know that normed division algebras exist in these dimensions. The only remaining question is whether they are unique. For this it helps to investigate more deeply the relation between normed division algebras and the Cayley-Dickson construction. In what follows, we outline an approach based on ideas in the book by Springer and Veldkamp .
First, suppose is a normed division algebra. Then there is a unique linear operator such that and for . With some calculation one can prove this makes into a nicely normed -algebra.
Next, suppose that is any subalgebra of the normed division algebra
. It is easy to check that is a nicely normed -algebra in
its own right. If is not all of , we can find an element that is orthogonal to every element of . Without loss of
generality we shall assume this element has norm 1. Since this element
is orthogonal to , it is imaginary. From the definition
of the operator it follows that , and from results
earlier in this section we have . With further calculation
one can show that for all we have
Thus, whenever we have a normed division algebra we can find a chain of subalgebras such that . To construct , we simply need to choose a norm-one element of that is orthogonal to every element of . It follows that the only normed division algebras of dimension 1, 2, 4 and 8 are and . This also gives an alternate proof that there are no normed division algebras of other dimensions: if there were any, there would have to be a 16-dimensional one, namely — the sedenions. But as mentioned in Section 2.2, one can check explicitly that the sedenions are not a division algebra.
© 2001 John Baez